Effect of Serum Lipid Profile on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,628,871 Women.

Journal of clinical medicine. 2022;11(15)
Full text from:

Plain language summary

Elevated fats in the blood have been associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. However, exact relationships between which fats is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 studies with 36,590 women aimed to investigate the relationship between fat in the blood and breast cancer risk. The results showed that high levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in the blood decreased a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer, however other fats in the blood such as triglycerides, cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein had no relationship with breast cancer risk. It was concluded that low levels of HDL in the blood are related to an increased risk for breast cancer. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that it is important to recommend exercise, which is a way of increasing HDL’s, in women who are at risk of breast cancer development.

Abstract

Dyslipidemia has been linked to breast cancer incidence. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to further investigate the relationship between the serum lipid profile and breast cancer risk. Databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Sciences were searched up to the end of January 2021 using certain MeSH and non-MeSH keywords and combinations to extract related published articles. Twenty-six prospective studies involving 1,628,871 women, of whom 36,590 were diagnosed with breast cancer during the follow-up period met the inclusion criteria. A negative and significant association was found between the HDL-C level and the risk of breast cancer (relative risk (RR): 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-0.99, I2: 67.6%, p = 0.04). In contrast, TG (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.13, I2: 54.2%, p = 0.79), total cholesterol (TC) (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.90-1.06, I2: 67.2%, p = 0.57), apolipoprotein A (ApoA) (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.30, I2: 83.5%, p = 0.78) and LDL-C (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.79-1.09, I2: 0%, p = 0.386) were not associated with breast cancer development. In studies adjusting for hormone use and physical activity, breast cancer risk was positively correlated with TC (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10). Similarly, TG was significantly related to breast cancer development after adjustment for baseline lipids (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99) and race (any races mentioned in each study) (RR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.22-2.65). In the present meta-analysis, HDL-C was inversely related to breast cancer risk. Overall, data on the links between lipids and breast cancer are conflicting. However, there is increasing evidence that low HDL-C is related to an increased risk for this type of malignancy.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal ; Detoxification and biotransformational
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Blood lipids
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable
Publication Type : Journal Article ; Review

Metadata